<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwizguide.info/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>SMR Audio/Video Forums</title>
  <link>http://www.smr-forums.com</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; SMR Audio/Video Forums : Last 10 Posts</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:50:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 8.02</generator>
  <ttl>30</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.smr-forums.com/RSS_topic_feed.asp</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>Lexicon Processors &amp; Receivers : MC-12HD V2 released</title>
   <link>http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1346&amp;PID=9211#9211</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.smr-forums.com/member_profile.asp?PF=62">Phil Olson</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> MC-12HD V2 released<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 29 Jul 2010 at 10:50am<br /><br />Video:<DIV>Primary Out:&nbsp;&nbsp;HDMI</DIV><DIV>TV Aspect:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 16.9W/Auto</DIV><DIV>TV:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; NTSC</DIV><DIV>Output Res:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Source Direct</DIV><DIV>1080p24 Out:&nbsp;Auto</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Audio:</DIV><DIV>Secondarty Audio:&nbsp;Off</DIV><DIV>HDMI Audio:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;LPCM</DIV><DIV>SACD Out:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; DSD</DIV><DIV>HD CD Decoding:&nbsp;&nbsp; On</DIV><DIV>LPCM Limit:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 192K</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>When I hit the DTS button, I can't be 100% sure but I think it said NEOS DTS.&nbsp; Does that sound right?</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Hope this is what you need.&nbsp; Thanks for your efforts!</DIV><DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Phil</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1346&amp;PID=9211#9211</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Lexicon Processors &amp; Receivers : MC12 : v2 to V5 upgrade</title>
   <link>http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1506&amp;PID=9210#9210</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.smr-forums.com/member_profile.asp?PF=444">alex_t</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> MC12 : v2 to V5 upgrade<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 28 Jul 2010 at 9:11am<br /><br />Thanks chrisautosound.<br><br>I will do it probably this weekend.<br><br>Regards<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1506&amp;PID=9210#9210</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Lexicon Processors &amp; Receivers : MC12 : v2 to V5 upgrade</title>
   <link>http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1506&amp;PID=9209#9209</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.smr-forums.com/member_profile.asp?PF=648">chrisautosound</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> MC12 : v2 to V5 upgrade<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 28 Jul 2010 at 7:47am<br /><br />the softwate update&nbsp; does not affect the boot&nbsp;rom, what&nbsp; you could call a BIOS chip. <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>So a failed SW update can be&nbsp;done again.&nbsp;Just &nbsp;like reinstalling&nbsp; windows. </DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1506&amp;PID=9209#9209</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Lexicon Processors &amp; Receivers : Pyramid Audio</title>
   <link>http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1466&amp;PID=9208#9208</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.smr-forums.com/member_profile.asp?PF=23">ggrieble</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Pyramid Audio<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27 Jul 2010 at 7:30pm<br /><br />I dunno. I was only told they changed to the new supply because it was more reliable.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1466&amp;PID=9208#9208</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Lexicon Processors &amp; Receivers : MC-12HD V2 released</title>
   <link>http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1346&amp;PID=9207#9207</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.smr-forums.com/member_profile.asp?PF=1268">Todd Packer</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> MC-12HD V2 released<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27 Jul 2010 at 6:15pm<br /><br />Thanks Phil, that does make more sense. What settings do you have the oppo set to for video and audio format? Auto detect&nbsp;or something else? And if you can remember&nbsp;what DTS format does the MC12 display on the front panel when you hit the button?]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1346&amp;PID=9207#9207</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Lexicon Processors &amp; Receivers : Pyramid Audio</title>
   <link>http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1466&amp;PID=9206#9206</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.smr-forums.com/member_profile.asp?PF=1439">Chucka</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Pyramid Audio<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27 Jul 2010 at 5:41pm<br /><br /><P>In what year&nbsp;did Lexicon switch to the "better" power supply?&nbsp; Any idea what serial number this would represent?</P><P>Chucka</P>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1466&amp;PID=9206#9206</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Lexicon Processors &amp; Receivers : Pyramid Audio</title>
   <link>http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1466&amp;PID=9205#9205</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.smr-forums.com/member_profile.asp?PF=23">ggrieble</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Pyramid Audio<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27 Jul 2010 at 5:40pm<br /><br />The new PS is supposedly more reliable and later production units were equipped with it right from Lexicon. It's not cheap though...$200 (but having the new unit on hand would reduce your down time).]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1466&amp;PID=9205#9205</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Lexicon Processors &amp; Receivers : MC-12 with Internal EQ or MC-12 with Audyssey EQ</title>
   <link>http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1503&amp;PID=9204#9204</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.smr-forums.com/member_profile.asp?PF=1378">stew</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> MC-12 with Internal EQ or MC-12 with Audyssey EQ<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27 Jul 2010 at 5:14pm<br /><br />&#091;/QUOTE&#093;That's the part I have trouble buying as well; at least based on personal experience.&nbsp;Part of the reason it scored low may have to do with tonal balance.&nbsp;There are a couple of slides in that presentation that are interesting to compare: measured response and perceived response. The Harman EQs both have a downward tilt, but were perceived as flat. The bottom two measure flatter, but were perceived as having&nbsp;rising treble. Listeners&nbsp;may have gotten&nbsp;turned off by&nbsp;'thin' sounding systems.&nbsp;&nbsp;<div>&nbsp;</div><div>Sanjay</div>&#091;/QUOTE&#093;<br><br>That could be a possibility,but with the MC-12 I could always apply the tilt.<br><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1503&amp;PID=9204#9204</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Lexicon Processors &amp; Receivers : Pyramid Audio</title>
   <link>http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1466&amp;PID=9203#9203</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.smr-forums.com/member_profile.asp?PF=1378">stew</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Pyramid Audio<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27 Jul 2010 at 5:07pm<br /><br /><div class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by ggrieble</strong></em><br /><br />I took out the old supply without disassembling the unit and removing the rear panel but swapping from the old PS to the new PS pretty much requires the disassembly I mentioned above (well it may be possible to do it with out taking it apart but removing the rear panel is not that involved). The new supply is mounted with 4 standoffs.</div><br><br>Well,mine must be the original.I'm wondering if I should replace it or if the saying "If it ain't broke don't fix it" applies.lol<br><br>Thanks Geoff,<br><span style="font-size:10px"><br /><br />Edited by stew - 27 Jul 2010 at 5:08pm</span>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1466&amp;PID=9203#9203</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>Lexicon Processors &amp; Receivers : MC-12 with Internal EQ or MC-12 with Audyssey EQ</title>
   <link>http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1503&amp;PID=9202#9202</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.smr-forums.com/member_profile.asp?PF=9">Sanjay Durani</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> MC-12 with Internal EQ or MC-12 with Audyssey EQ<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> 27 Jul 2010 at 4:57pm<br /><br /><div class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by stew</strong></em><br /><br />It just seems strange that the Audyssey would get the worst rating of all and to be considered worse than no EQ is really hard to believe.</div>That's the part I have trouble buying as well; at least based on personal experience.&nbsp;Part of the reason it scored low may have to do with tonal balance.&nbsp;There are a couple of slides in that presentation that are interesting to compare: measured response and perceived response. The Harman EQs both have a downward tilt, but were perceived as flat. The bottom two measure flatter, but were perceived as having&nbsp;rising treble. Listeners&nbsp;may have gotten&nbsp;turned off by&nbsp;'thin' sounding systems.&nbsp;&nbsp;<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>Sanjay</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.smr-forums.com/forum_posts.asp?TID=1503&amp;PID=9202#9202</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>